Skip to content

Similarweb

US · SMWB #3491 by market cap Listed 2021
9.05 +0.62 +7.35%
Live - 5344 symbols - heartbeat 98s ago · 2026-10-09 19:59

Valuation each multiple against its own 5-year range

P/B ratio 31.51 Expensive vs history 68th percentile
5-year average 24.98 · #206 of 213 in Software - Application
P/E ratio -32.52 Cheap vs history 22nd percentile
5-year average -24.27 · forward 120.89
P/S ratio 2.43 Cheap vs history 33rd percentile
5-year average 3.45 · forward 2.13 · #99 of 234 in Software - Application

Vs. peers Software - Application

Company Market cap P/E (TTM) P/B Div yield
Similarweb (SMWB) 798.65M -36.20 35.08 0.00%
SAP SE (SAP) 247.90B 28.71 4.95 1.33%
Shopify (SHOP) 219.82B 115.44 17.33 0.00%
Salesforce (CRM) 188.57B 20.98 4.91 0.75%
Uber Technologies (UBER) 146.06B 15.68 5.35 0.00%
ServiceNow (NOW) 145.63B 88.04 11.64 0.00%

Other StockVane-tracked companies in the same industry.

Morningstar

★★★☆☆ Fair value10.39 Economic moatNone UncertaintyHigh

Trading 14.8% below Morningstar's fair value estimate.

Fair value

Similarweb Ltd receives a 3-star quantitative star rating, indicating our belief that this share class is a balanced choice, but prudent investors should consider looking elsewhere. The stock currently trades at a 22% discount to our quantitative fair value estimate of $10.39 per share; however, caution is warranted due to this estimate's high uncertainty rating. We require the price/fair value ratio to move a certain amount before the star rating can change. This stability-enhancing buffer is in effect for this stock.

The company's balance sheet bolsters our quantitative valuation. Leverage can enable a company to invest in growth, potentially boosting shareholder value more than equity financing alone. For example, the firm's EBITDA/interest coverage ratio of -0.4 lies in the bottom 20% compared with peers globally. Although the firm's ability to cover interest payments with EBITDA is limited, shares could sharply rebound if economic circumstances change or recent investments reduce fears of default. We believe this is a sign that shares could be undervalued.

Alternatively, the company's valuation metrics are potentially concerning. A company's valuation metrics provide insights into the market's expectations for its future growth and profitability. The firm's enterprise value to EBITDA ratio of 41.7, a core component of valuation, sits in the top 20% compared with global peers. This suggests that the value of its enterprise value, or the value of its shares and debt, is a high multiple of the generated EBITDA. Despite our favorable price/fair value ratio, this characteristic is a negative attribute.

In addition to the aforementioned drivers, our model considers momentum as part of its comprehensive analysis. This share class has been a laggard relative to the broader universe over the past year. This underperformance makes the stock appear cheap, which portends a buying opportunity in light of other contributors to our model.

Economic moat

With its quantitative economic moat rating of none, we do not expect this company to materially outearn its cost of capital in the long run. Additionally, the firm's moderate financial health score suggests it is acceptably positioned against adverse economic circumstances.

By Quantitative Equity Report

Quote time 2026-10-09 19:59:22 · For reference only, not investment advice and not tailored to your situation.

Similarweb discussion 0 comments

Add a comment