United Fire Group
- Market cap
- 1.42B
- P/E (TTM)i
- 10.21
- P/Bi
- 1.45
- EPSi
- 4.48
- Div yieldi
- 1.31%
- 52W posi
- 94%
Anonymous reader poll. Unscientific, not investment advice.
Valuation each multiple against its own 5-year range
Vs. peers Insurance - Property & Casualty
| Company | Market cap | P/E (TTM)i | P/Bi | Div yieldi |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United Fire Group (UFCS) | 1.42B | 10.21 | 1.45 | 1.31% |
| Chubb Ltd (CB) | 129.13B | 11.86 | 1.71 | 1.17% |
| Progressive (PGR) | 124.28B | 10.74 | 3.62 | 6.49% |
| The Travelers Companies (TRV) | 75.21B | 9.69 | 2.27 | 1.26% |
| Allstate (ALL) | 56.63B | 4.48 | 1.79 | 1.86% |
| WR Berkley (WRB) | 25.89B | 14.35 | 2.63 | 0.53% |
Other StockVane-tracked companies in the same industry.
Morningstar
Trading 7.5% above Morningstar's fair value estimate.
Fair value
United Fire Group Inc is assigned a 3-star quantitative star rating, reflecting our opinion that this share class is a balanced choice, but prudent investors should consider looking elsewhere. The stock currently trades at a 8% premium over our quantitative fair value estimate of $50.91 per share; however, this estimate should be taken with a pinch of salt due to its high uncertainty rating.
The company's balance sheet decreases our estimated fair value. Low leverage can limit a company's ability to invest in growth, potentially reducing shareholder value compared with a balanced use of debt and equity financing. Reflecting the firm's leverage is its debt to EBITDA ratio of 0.7, which falls in the bottom 20% compared with global peers. With little debt relative to assets, this firm has a "lazy" balance sheet, which can depress returns on invested capital. We believe this is a sign that shares could be expensive.
Alternatively, the firm's valuation metrics are reassuring. A company's valuation metrics provide insights into the market's expectations for its future growth and profitability. The firm's book value yield of 69.6%, for example, ranks in the top 45% compared with peers globally. The market price is low relative to the book (accounting) value of the company's equity, which, despite our unfavorable price/fair value ratio, is a positive attribute.
In addition to the aforementioned drivers, our model considers momentum as part of its comprehensive analysis. This share class has outperformed the broader universe over the past year. This outperformance may signify a bull trap, in light of other detractors from our model.
Economic moat
This company lacks a competitive advantage, receiving a quantitative economic moat rating of none. However, its financial health score is strong, suggesting that the company should be well positioned to weather tough times.
By Quantitative Equity Report
Quote time 2026-10-08 04:05:10 · For reference only, not investment advice and not tailored to your situation.