Strategy
- Market cap
- 64.72B
- P/E (TTM)i
- -1.58
- P/Bi
- 2.10
- EPSi
- -15.23
- Div yieldi
- 0.00%
- 52W posi
- 31%
Anonymous reader poll. Unscientific, not investment advice.
Valuation each multiple against its own 5-year range
Vs. peers Software - Application
| Company | Market cap | P/E (TTM)i | P/Bi | Div yieldi |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategy (MSTR) | 64.72B | -1.58 | 2.10 | 0.00% |
| SAP SE (SAP) | 242.53B | 28.10 | 4.84 | 1.36% |
| Shopify (SHOP) | 213.62B | 112.18 | 16.84 | 0.00% |
| Salesforce (CRM) | 184.81B | 20.56 | 4.82 | 0.76% |
| ServiceNow (NOW) | 142.54B | 86.17 | 11.39 | 0.00% |
| Uber Technologies (UBER) | 139.81B | 15.01 | 5.12 | 0.00% |
Other StockVane-tracked companies in the same industry.
Morningstar
Trading 6.8% above Morningstar's fair value estimate.
Fair value
Strategy Inc receives a 3-star quantitative star rating, reflecting our opinion that this share class is a balanced choice, but prudent investors should consider looking elsewhere. The stock currently trades at a 7% premium over our quantitative fair value estimate of $142.87 per share; however, this estimate should be taken with a pinch of salt due to its very high uncertainty rating.
The firm's valuation metrics undermine our estimated fair value. A company's valuation metrics provide insights into the market's expectations for its future growth and profitability. For example, the firm's enterprise value to EBITDA ratio falls in the top 1% globally. This suggests that the value of its enterprise value, or the value of its shares and debt, is a high multiple of the generated EBITDA. We believe this is a sign that shares could be expensive.
The firm's lack of profitability is an additional cause for concern. Companies with low profitability are often less resilient in recessions and are likely to generate weaker future cash flows for shareholders. The firm's sales yield of 1.0%, a core component of profitability, ranks in the bottom 10% compared with global peers. This company's inability to generate significant sales growth without meaningful capital investment is a challenge, which further promotes our unfavorable price/fair value ratio.
In addition to the aforementioned drivers, our model considers momentum as part of its comprehensive analysis. This share class has been a laggard relative to the broader universe over the past year. While we believe the stock is overvalued, this underperformance had a positive impact on our valuation estimate.
Economic moat
With its quantitative economic moat rating of none, we do not expect this company to materially outearn its cost of capital in the long run. Additionally, the firm's moderate financial health score suggests it is acceptably positioned against adverse economic circumstances.
By Quantitative Equity Report
Quote time 2026-10-08 06:50:15 · For reference only, not investment advice and not tailored to your situation.