Tractor Supply
- Market cap
- 16.94B
- P/E (TTM)i
- 16.94
- P/Bi
- 6.44
- EPSi
- 2.06
- Div yieldi
- 2.89%
- 52W posi
- 15%
Anonymous reader poll. Unscientific, not investment advice.
✦ Quant Fair Value how this is computed
- Implied fair-value range of 42.33-56.68, from this stock's own trailing 5-year average P/E applied to trailing EPS.
- Current price is -34.3% below the average-multiple fair value of 49.51.
Valuation each multiple against its own 5-year range
Vs. peers Specialty Retail
| Company | Market cap | P/E (TTM)i | P/Bi | Div yieldi |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tractor Supply (TSCO) | 16.94B | 16.94 | 6.44 | 2.89% |
| Williams-Sonoma (WSM) | 28.32B | 24.66 | 13.23 | 1.18% |
| Caseys General Stores (CASY) | 23.41B | 30.50 | 5.72 | 0.37% |
| Ulta Beauty (ULTA) | 23.32B | 19.86 | 8.82 | 0.00% |
| Best Buy (BBY) | 17.74B | 14.07 | 5.57 | 4.52% |
| Dick's Sporting Goods (DKS) | 12.92B | 14.48 | 2.26 | 3.75% |
Other StockVane-tracked companies in the same industry.
Morningstar
Trading 29.2% below Morningstar's fair value estimate.
Analyst note
Tractor Supply's needs-based products have been in demand despite economic duress, driving positive consumable, usable, and edible sales. But discretionary demand has suffered, as evidenced by big ticket sales down midsingle digits in its second quarter, provoking near-term caution on shares.
Why it matters: In July, Tractor Supply rescinded its long-term outlook that included sales growth of 6%-8%, same-store sales growth of 3%-5%, and operating margins of 10.0%-10.5%. We see a lack of a catalyst for shares until a new outlook is provided, which is set to arrive with full-year results. According to the firm, the factors driving lower confidence around the long-term algorithm are multifaceted. First, inflationary pressures have weighed on the farm and rural consumers that represent 40% of its user base in a market that has been flat to negative in most of 2026. Second, the pace of dog adoptions has fallen recently, affecting consumables takeaway in a flat to modestly positive market. Lastly, the home repair market has been flat in recent years. In total, these weak markets have made it difficult to lift comps above 2% to leverage costs.
The bottom line: We lower our fair value estimate for wide-moat Tractor Supply to $42 per share from $46 after applying two changes to our model. We reduced our long-term same-store sales outlook to 2.9% from 3.4% and our terminal operating margin to 9.8% from 10.5%. We don’t see the fundamentals of the business as flawed. Rather we think that cyclical, exogenous issues will pressure operating margins longer than anticipated. Still, we believe the firm is taking steps to extract rising economics out of its boxes when consumer sentiment stabilizes. Better merchandising via localized offerings, premium nutrition, and exclusive brands should help restore pet category growth. Fewer store openings and underperforming store closures allow faster investment in areas like Project Fusion and final mile, which raise customer engagement.
Fair value
We are lowering our fair value estimate for Tractor Supply to $42 from $46 per share after applying two changes to our model. We have reduced our long-term same-store sales outlook to 2.9% from 3.4% and our terminal operating margin to 9.8% from 10.5% amid near-term discretionary headwinds. We remain encouraged by the firm’s efforts to mitigate weak consumer spending by focusing on its value proposition and pet offerings. The closing of 75 underperforming Petsense stores, similarly, signals an effort to allocate capital to the best return on investment projects (like project fusion and final mile capabilities) which should restore margin expansion.
Looking forward, the company lowered its 2026 outlook for sales growth to 2.5%-3.5% (from 4%-6% prior) and EPS to $1.90-$2.00 (from $2.13-$2.23) in July. As a result, we had trimmed our sales forecast and reduced our EPS estimate to $1.93 from $2.17. Beyond revising its 2026 outlook, Tractor Supply withdrew its long-term growth targets for 3%-5% comps and 8%-11% EPS. We have lowered our outlook long-term comps to 2.9% from 3.4% as we believe the consumer environment could remain pressured longer than we previously anticipated but still see opportunities for growth through direct sales, media growth, pet prescriptions, and portfolio expansion. Our fair value implies a 2026 price/earnings ratio of 22 times and a 2026 enterprise value of 12 times.
Over the medium term (the next five years), we project average sales growth of 5%, supported by 2.1% average comparable-store sales growth and 3% average square-footage growth. We forecast gross margins to remain largely static over the next decade, constrained by our belief that e-commerce retailers can compete in about 30% of the sales areas Tractor Supply operates in and the everyday-low-price strategy. We forecast the selling, general, and administrative expense ratio to decline modestly (10 basis points) from 2025 at the end of our forecast (23.7%) as the business continues to invest to maintain its leadership position in the outdoor enthusiast segment and onboards new distribution centers to extract efficiencies. Our model assumes 30 basis points of operating margin improvement from 2025 over the next decade, as consistent improvements in the supply chain and merchandising are largely offset by elevated investment to remain a best-in-class retailer. Over the long term, we project a 13% average rate of return on invested capital versus our 7.5% cost of capital assumption, providing quantitative support for our wide economic moat view.
Economic moat
We have assigned a wide Morningstar Economic Moat Rating to Tractor Supply, stemming from its brand intangible asset, thanks to investments that enhance its differentiated one-stop-shop model. First, the firm’s unique product mix deepens engagement with its underserved consumers and allows Tractor Supply to capture a larger share of its consumers’ wallets. Likewise, higher-margin private-label continues to represent a healthy percentage of sales, leaving consumers tied to brands exclusively sold at Tractor Supply. Second, the firm’s brand has strengthened through investments in its omnichannel capabilities, loyalty program, footprint expansion, digital proficiency, and customer service. Together, we contend these factors help solidify Tractor Supply’s position, a first mover in the national outdoor retail space, limiting the appeal for new entrants. Tractor Supply has delivered an average adjusted return on invested capital, including goodwill, of 18% over the past five years, well above our 7.5% weighted average cost of capital estimate and we project ROICs to average 13% over the next decade.
We believe Tractor Supply’s product assortment and positioning in less densely populated regions provides the firm with structural advantages over regional competitors. At its core, Tractor Supply rigorously adheres to its consumer base’s “Life Out Here” lifestyle in product assortment, which allows the brand to resonate with underserved rural customers. Through Tractor Supply’s ongoing evolution to enhance awareness, it has expanded into in-store pet washing centers, PetVet clinics, pet insurance, and pet and livestock prescriptions. Further value creation stems from transforming side lots to outdoor garden centers. By spring of 2026, nearly 50% of its stores had garden centers or live good tents, tapping into a new end market user.
Furthermore, we believe Tractor Supply’s strong suite of private-label offerings adds to its intangible assets, elevating its brand. These products can boast profitability around 500 basis points above national brands. And the firm has grown its private-label penetration to 30% of sales in 2025, up from 21% in 2010, two of which have surpassed $500 million in annual sales. We see private-label penetration in consumable, usable, and edible, or CUE, products as a key factor in consumer stickiness, as regularly used products like pet food drive purchase frequency.
Additionally, we commend Tractor Supply for developing its omnichannel capabilities early. The firm added a buy online pickup in store, or BOPIS, option prior to the pandemic. In 2025, more than 80% of digital transactions utilized the BOPIS system, driving in-store traffic and fulfillment. Tractor Supply exceeded $1 billion in digital sales in fiscal 2024, representing a high-single-digit percentage of Tractor Supply's total sales, substantially surpassing the farm and ranch retail industry's average of 1%. We believe this capability protects Tractor Supply’s competitive position.
Tractor Supply has been able to capture positive perception of team member friendliness, speed and ease of checkout, and team member knowledge. Associates advise consumers with stellar customer service stemming from internal cultural initiatives, providing impeccable customer service. Recent endeavors, such as Project Fusion (layout improvements) and final mile expansion should also drive customer satisfaction. Historically, Project Fusion locations with a garden center saw a high-single-digit lift in comparable sales. Final mile efforts also elevate the delivery experience for consumers in hard-to-reach rural America. This has led to higher order size, lower return rates, and better repeat engagement from big barn customers. Continuous improvement initiatives should further improve the firm's customer service metrics, protecting its market share leadership.
Brand gains also stem from the private-label credit card, the addition of mixing centers (to improve in-stock levels of inventory), and a robust loyalty program. Credit card data offers visibility into localized purchasing patterns of different demographics, allowing for optimal merchandising. And the Neighbor’s Club loyalty program, which now boasts over 40 million members, offers insight into the behavior of Tractor Supply’s best customers to ensure appropriate product availability. Around 80% of total sales stem from loyalty members, which historically have spent three times more than nonmembers and exhibit above 95% retention rate.
In considering the competitive landscape, we think Tractor Supply is protected from brand erosion from new entrants for a few reasons. To start, we surmise the capital investment required to enter the market makes the endeavor unattractive. For a competitor to open 1,000 boxes, a new firm would require significant capital to finance preopening costs. But we note even with Tractor Supply’s success over the last decade, there have been no competitors that have grown to become an increasing threat—in fact, the nearest similar peer, Menard’s, still has less than 350 locations and remains regionally based.
In addition, even if a peer could scale locations, we suspect the entrant would have to pay a premium to attract and train talent, particularly when labor is constrained. On top of that, a national competitor would have to either find existing, or build new, strategically located distribution facilities to keep pace with fast-turning CUE inventory and a wide geographic footprint. Here, an outsider could struggle to secure the vendor relationships necessary to support the scale of the business quickly, given the relative uncertainty tied to forging contracts with unproven, incoming players. Altogether, we believe the lack of a differentiated product assortment, wide footprint, and superior customer service levels will remain challenging factors for competitors to overcome.
Bull case
Tractor Supply has room for growth, which should help it achieve 8% average annual EPS growth over the next decade (at the low end of the 8%-11% it had previously expected). A faster rollout of side lot projects, rapid media, and/or big barn sales growth could lead to upside.
The firm is partially insulated from e-commerce competitors due to its assortment of products that have immediate need or are costly to ship.
With its distribution network perpetually evolving, Tractor Supply should be able to better leverage logistics expenses, lowering its distribution costs.
Bear case
Tractor Supply will have to innovate to keep its market leadership position and ensure elevated brand relevance in an intensely competitive retail environment.
Optimal real estate opportunities could become more challenging to capture, especially if real estate prices increase in prospective regions, as the firm expands further into competitors’ markets.
Free cash flow could be tempered in the near term due to increases in capital expenditures to roll out merchandise initiatives, build out the distribution network and last mile capabilities, store expansion costs, and IT upgrades.
By Jaime M. Katz, CFA, Aidan Kernell
Quote time 2026-10-08 07:00:13 · For reference only, not investment advice and not tailored to your situation.